By Eric TuckerThe Related Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal decide on Nov. 24 dismissed the felony instances in opposition to former FBI Director James Comey and New York Lawyer Normal Letitia James, concluding that the prosecutor who introduced the costs at President Donald Trump’s urging was illegally appointed by the Justice Division.
The rulings from U.S. District Choose Cameron McGowan Currie halt no less than for now a pair of prosecutions that had focused two of the president’s most high-profile political opponents and quantity to a shocking rebuke of the Trump administration’s authorized maneuvering to put in an inexperienced and loyalist prosecutor prepared to file the instances.
The orders don’t concern the substance of the allegations in opposition to Comey or James however as an alternative take care of the unconventional method during which the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, was named to her place as interim U.S. lawyer for the Japanese District of Virginia. Protection attorneys stated the Trump administration had no authorized authority to make the appointment. In a pair of comparable rulings, Currie agreed and stated the invalid appointment required the dismissal of the instances.
“All actions flowing from Ms. Halligan’s faulty appointment,” together with securing and signing the indictments, “had been illegal workouts of govt energy and are hereby put aside,” she wrote.
The Justice Division didn’t instantly disclose its subsequent steps, although it might attraction the rulings and will look to refile the instances.
“The information of the indictments in opposition to Comey and James haven’t modified and this won’t be the ultimate phrase on the matter,” stated White Home spokeswoman Abigail Jackson.
Indictments had been topic to a number of challenges
The challenges to Halligan’s appointment are only one aspect of a multiprong assault on the indictments by Comey and James, whose a number of different efforts to dismiss the instances had been nonetheless pending on the time of the Nov. 24 rulings. Each have individually asserted that the prosecutions had been vindictive and emblematic of a weaponized Justice Division. Comey’s attorneys final week, in shifting to get his case tossed out, seized on a decide’s findings of a constellation of grand jury irregularities and missteps by Halligan. James likewise has cited “outrageous authorities conduct” previous her indictment.
“I’m grateful that the courtroom ended the case in opposition to me, which was a prosecution based mostly on malevolence and incompetence and a mirrored image of what the Justice Division has change into beneath Donald Trump, which is heartbreaking,” Comey, who has pleaded not responsible to fees of creating a false assertion and obstructing Congress, stated in a video assertion.
In a separate assertion, James, a Democrat who has pleaded not responsible to mortgage fraud allegations, stated, “I’m heartened by right this moment’s victory and grateful for the prayers and help I’ve acquired from across the nation.” She stated she remained “fearless within the face of those baseless fees as I proceed preventing for New Yorkers each single day.”
Halligan’s appointment
At challenge in Currie’s rulings is the mechanism the Trump administration employed to nominate Halligan, a former White Home aide with no prior prosecutorial expertise, to guide one of many Justice Division’s most elite and necessary workplaces.
Halligan was named as a alternative for Erik Siebert, a veteran prosecutor within the workplace and interim U.S. lawyer who resigned in September amid Trump administration strain to file fees in opposition to each Comey and James. He stepped apart after Trump instructed reporters he needed Siebert “out.” Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi swore in Halligan quickly after.
The next night time, Trump stated he can be nominating Halligan to the position of interim U.S. lawyer and publicly implored Bondi to take motion in opposition to his political opponents, saying in a Fact Social publish that, “We are able to’t delay any longer, it’s killing our status and credibility” and “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”
Comey was indicted three days after Halligan was sworn in, and James was charged two weeks after that.
Although attorneys normal do have the authority to call an interim U.S. lawyer who can serve for 120 days, attorneys for Comey and James argued that after that interval expires, the regulation offers federal judges within the district the unique say of who will get to fill the emptiness. By making a successive interim U.S. appointment and bypassing the position of courts, protection attorneys stated, the Justice Division did an end-run round well-established regulation. Currie agreed.
“The 120-day clock started operating with Mr. Siebert’s appointment on January 21, 2025. When that clock expired on Could 21, 2025, so too did the Lawyer Normal’s appointment authority,” Currie wrote. “Consequently, I conclude that the Lawyer Normal’s try to put in Ms. Halligan as Interim U.S. Lawyer for the Japanese District of Virginia was invalid and that Ms. Halligan has been unlawfully serving in that position since September 22, 2025.”
The Justice Division had defended Halligan’s appointment however revealed final month that it additionally had given Halligan a separate place of “Particular Lawyer,” presumably as a solution to defend the indictment from collapse. However Currie stated such a retroactive appointment couldn’t save the instances.
“The implications of a opposite conclusion are extraordinary,” the decide wrote. “It could imply the Authorities may ship any personal citizen off the road — lawyer or not — into the grand jury room to safe an indictment as long as the Lawyer Normal offers her approval after the actual fact. That can not be the regulation.”
Although the defendants had requested for the instances to be dismissed with prejudice, that means the Justice Division can be barred from bringing them once more, Currie as an alternative dismissed them with out prejudice.
Comey was indicted simply days earlier than the statute of limitations in his case expired, which may complicate any effort to refile the case. One among his attorneys, Patrick Fitzgerald, stated in an announcement that Currie’s determination “additional signifies that as a result of the indictment is void, the statute of limitations has run and there will be no additional indictment.”
Judges have individually held that a number of different interim U.S. attorneys — in New Jersey, Los Angeles and Nevada — have served of their positions unlawfully however have permitted instances introduced by their workplaces to proceed. However attorneys for Comey and James had argued that Currie’s ruling wanted to go even additional as a result of Halligan was apparently the one prosecutor who introduced proof to the grand juries.
Comey has for years been certainly one of Trump’s chief antagonists. Appointed FBI director in 2013 by President Barack Obama, Comey on the time of Trump’s 2016 election was overseeing an investigation into whether or not the Republican’s presidential marketing campaign had conspired with Russia to sway the end result of the race. Livid over that investigation, Trump fired Comey in Could 2017.
James has additionally been a frequent goal of Trump’s ire, particularly since successful a staggering judgment in opposition to him and the Trump Group in a lawsuit alleging he defrauded banks by overstating the worth of his actual property holdings on monetary statements. An appeals courtroom overturned the nice, which had ballooned to greater than $500 million with curiosity, however upheld a decrease courtroom’s discovering that Trump had dedicated fraud.
____
Related Press writers Michael R. Sisak in New York and Lindsay Whitehurst and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed to this report.
