In 1965, Congress handed the Voting Rights Act—a landmark legislation broadly hailed as the best instrument for shielding the political voice of Black People.
Now, that basis is underneath severe menace in a pivotal Supreme Court docket case: Louisiana v. Callais.
On the middle of the controversy is a redistricting battle in Louisiana, the place Black residents make up almost a 3rd of the inhabitants. But after the 2020 Census, lawmakers drew only one majority-Black congressional district out of six. A federal court docket dominated this violated Part 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bans racially discriminatory voting practices, and ordered a second majority-Black district.
Louisiana complied — just for the brand new map to be challenged by a gaggle of white voters. They argued it was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Now the Supreme Court docket has stepped in — and what began as a state-level dispute could now determine the destiny of Part 2 itself. In different phrases, if Part 2 of the Voting Rights Act will be overturned or vastly weakened in Louisiana, will probably be overturned or vastly weakened nationally.
Authorized students warn that if Part 2 is weakened or struck down, it might grow to be almost unattainable to problem racially biased maps. Black voting energy — already being minimized — might face steep setbacks.
Try the video and study extra about why this case is without doubt one of the most important circumstances in our lifetime.
MORE FROM THE DEFENDER
