The Supreme Court docket has agreed to listen to an attraction on a non secular rights case introduced by a religious Rastafarian whose locs had been chopped off by Louisiana jail guards in 2020. At situation is whether or not Damon Landor can sue jail officers and recoup financial damages for violating his non secular rights.
Landor had taken a non secular vow to not reduce his hair and after nearly 20 years it had grown to his knees, in accordance with NBC Information. He was nearly completed serving a five-month sentence on a drug conviction and was even holding a replica of the court docket order that allowed non secular lodging for Rastafarians, when jail guards ignored the paperwork, handcuffed Landor to a chair and shaved off his locs.

Landor filed a lawsuit after his launch underneath the Non secular Land Use and Institutionalized Individuals Act, a 2000 federal regulation defending the non secular freedom of individuals in establishments like prisons. Decrease courts dismissed his case and the fifth U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals dominated he couldn’t sue jail officers for damages.
In a court docket submitting, state officers denounced what occurred to Landor and mentioned the Louisiana Division of Corrections and Public Security had made modifications to its insurance policies to ensure what occurred to Landor didn’t occur to anybody else. However in addition they argued Landor couldn’t maintain correction officers personally accountable underneath federal regulation.
Louisiana’s attorneys contended that if Landor’s case had been allowed to maneuver ahead there can be “quite a few unintended penalties,” together with a harder surroundings for hiring jail and jail staff, USA Immediately reported.
“It’s usually damages or nothing,” his legal professionals argued earlier than the Supreme Court docket in interesting for reduction.
The Division of Justice agreed, urging the Supreme Court docket to take the case as a result of the problem is “undeniably essential” and “recurs with some frequency.”
Attorneys for different non secular teams, together with Christians, Jews, Muslims and Sikh, weighed in, too, arguing earlier than the justices that, “Unburdened by the specter of damages, prisons have little incentive to enhance their insurance policies and defend prisoners from future abuse,” in accordance with USA Immediately.
And Landor’s attorneys argued that the court docket’s 2020 ruling permitting Muslim males to sue the FBI over their addition to a no-fly listing underneath the Non secular Freedom Restoration Act ought to information justices on this case, too.
Not everyone seems to be proud of the court docket’s determination. One social media person identified the excessive court docket didn’t comply with take up a case involving Fb and the web.
“Supreme Court docket Ignores On-line Censorship Disaster, Focuses As an alternative on Dreadlocks in Jail.”
And one other X person wrote, “I don’t belief this Supreme Court docket … we do have an issue.”
One other social media person was referred to as into query the court docket’s capacity to even resolve the case.
“Welp, if Dems can’t outline a girl, how can Lefty judges + “Righty however Really Lefty” Amy CB outline what a dreadlock is?”
Landor’s case is much like one out of Kentucky a couple of years in the past. In that case an inmate sued, additionally underneath the federal Non secular Land Use and Institutionalized Individuals Act, and Kentucky’s Non secular Freedom Restoration Act. Carlos Thurman, a working towards Rastafarian, had his hair forcibly reduce underneath the state correction’s division’s search coverage guidelines.
Rastafari began as a non secular and political motion within the Nineteen Thirties in Jamaica by Black folks in response to white colonialism. It was embraced by teams all over the world. It blends Outdated Testomony teachings with the concept of returning to Africa. Musicians Bob Marley and Peter Tosh helped unfold the Rasta message throughout the Nineteen Seventies.
The Supreme Court docket agreed to take up Landor’s attraction in its subsequent time period beginning in October, which runs by June of 2026.