This text was initially revealed on Aug 31 2:30pm EDT by THE CITY
Prosecutors throughout New York Metropolis are reviewing dozens of prison convictions after the NYPD knowledgeable them in July of an eight-year-old incident wherein three detectives have been concerned in a fingerprint misidentification at a Brooklyn crime scene.
The incident, which police mentioned didn’t result in any arrests or prosecutions, triggered the removing of Detective Joe Martinez from the Latent Print Part, which analyzes finger and palm print matches, the retraining of two detectives who validated his findings, and adjustments in division fingerprint comparability practices.
In 2015, investigators decided that Martinez “erroneously reported” that an individual described as “recognized to the NYPD” had been “recognized because the supply of a latent print left at a criminal offense scene,” in accordance with a letter despatched by Lt. Rosalyn Joseph, who heads the Latent Print Part, to town’s 5 DAs and the 2 native U.S. Legal professional’s workplaces. The letter didn’t describe the character of the crime underneath investigation.
In response to questions from THE CITY, the NYPD didn’t instantly clarify why it took so lengthy to disclose data to prosecutors, who’ve a constitutional obligation to reveal data favorable to defendants. In keeping with the July letter, the division performed its personal overview of previous circumstances and located “no discrepancies.” However public defenders and innocence attorneys expressed alarm on the belated revelations.
Martinez by no means once more labored as a latent print examiner and by no means testified once more, in accordance with a regulation enforcement supply conversant in the matter.
The errant identification had been “verified” by two of Martinez’s colleagues, detectives Edward Sanabria and Gerald Rex, however a month after the supposed match the division realized the person “couldn’t have been the supply of the crime scene latent fingerprint,” in accordance with the letter.
In response to inquiries from THE CITY, state and federal prosecutors confirmed that they’d launched, and had in some circumstances accomplished, inside evaluations. However the scale of these evaluations differed.
Manhattan District Legal professional Alvin Bragg’s prosecutors are in the midst of a overview of about 30 convictions. These circumstances embody ones wherein the three retired detectives made identifications or have been in any other case concerned, in accordance with a spokesperson.
A spokesperson for Brooklyn District Legal professional Eric Gonzalez mentioned his workplace’s Forensic Science Unit, Conviction Overview Unit and Appeals Bureau are probing eleven convictions that occurred after the NYPD’s overview of the incident in 2015. These convictions, which got here after Martinez was transferred out of the unit, concerned Sanabria and Rex.
Patrice O’Shaughnessy, a spokesperson for Bronx District Legal professional Darcel Clark, mentioned her workplace was first notified of the misidentification this July. “We notified the protection attorneys on 20 circumstances and we proceed to overview these circumstances as a part of our dedication to pursuing justice with integrity, disclosure obligations, and transparency,” she mentioned.
Frank Sobrino, a spokesperson for Queens District Legal professional Melinda Katz, mentioned his company performed a extra slim reinvestigation, reviewing simply three convictions wherein Martinez, Sanabria, or Rex had themselves recognized a defendant. The evaluation “confirmed the unique latent print outcomes,” he mentioned.
Staten Island District Legal professional spokesperson James Clinton, mentioned the workplace had an unbiased examiner overview and confirm the identifications that Sanabria or Rex did that contributed to 5 convictions within the borough. “Nonetheless, and within the curiosity of full disclosure, our workplace has begun sending letters to protection counsel on every of those circumstances notifying them of this disclosure by NYPD,” mentioned Clinton.
A spokesperson for the U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace of the Jap District of New York mentioned it had already performed a overview, which didn’t increase any purple flags. The U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace for the Southern District of New York declined to remark. The Bronx District Legal professional’s Workplace and the Household Courtroom Division of the New York Metropolis Company Counsel’s Workplace, which additionally acquired the letter, didn’t reply to requests for remark.
Legal professionals who signify defendants have been extra outspoken.
“The NYPD’s disclosure letter reveals subsequent to nothing about how this misidentification could have negatively impacted any variety of our purchasers’ circumstances,” mentioned Jenny Cheung, supervising lawyer of the Authorized Support Society’s DNA Unit, which handles forensic issues for the general public defender group. “It’s unacceptable that even one consumer would have their proper to a good trial jeopardized because of the NYPD’s failure to reveal, for almost a decade, all pertinent case-related data to defendants and their counsel. We want solutions now.”
Karen Newirth, founding father of Newirth Regulation, PLLC and a former lawyer with The Exoneration Mission, known as for an unbiased overview of all circumstances the detectives touched, together with these circumstances already reviewed by the NYPD.
“It’s not sufficient that the NYPD in its personal overview — the parameters of that are unknown — concluded that there have been ‘no discrepancies’ in different circumstances,” she mentioned, including that prosecutors ought to study the work of the unit “writ giant.”
Public information present Martinez left the NYPD round July 2016 and Sanabria left the drive in September 2017. Rex, whose LinkedIn profile says he served as lead teacher for the latent print division, on high of dealing with case work, left the drive in December 2019.
Messages despatched to all three former detectives, and cellphone messages that have been left on numbers listed for Rex, weren’t instantly responded to.
The Detectives Endowment Affiliation, the union representing present and retired detectives, didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
The NYPD letter to prosecutors famous that the division secured accreditation from a nationwide board in 2019, 4 years after the false identification.
The previous commander of the forensics unit informed AMNY that 12 months that securing the accreditation had required passing greater than 400 requirements.
THE CITY is an unbiased, nonprofit information outlet devoted to hard-hitting reporting that serves the individuals of New York.