White Home Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt discovered herself cornered at Thursday’s briefing when pressed on whether or not President Donald Trump has any limits on what he can tear down or destroy — even historic landmarks — with out oversight.
Because the questions mounted, she reached for each doable escape hatch, from citing authorized opinions to coining a brand-new development time period, in a scramble that solely made issues worse.
The grilling by CBS reporter Weijia Jiang got here after Trump unexpectedly demolished the East Wing of the White Home this week to make manner for his “large, stunning ballroom,” gorgeous People when photographs of the wreckage surfaced.
Jiang requested, “Can the president tear down something he desires with out oversight? Can he demolish this constructing, or, say the Jefferson Memorial?”
Jiang first referenced The Nationwide Capital Planning Fee (NCPC) and the truth that the administration claims Trump didn’t file development plans with the fee as a result of it solely has oversight on development initiatives on federal properties, not demolitions.
True to kind, Leavitt just about evaded the query even inventing the time period “vertical development” to elucidate that Trump didn’t want a allow throughout the demolition section, however would possibly throughout the development section, however even then, she didn’t precisely reply the query.
‘The Complete Recreation Is Rigged’: Trump Simply Let Slip How He Really Plans to Pay for Ballroom As a ‘Joke,’ However the Fumble Uncovered His Whole Recreation Plan
She referred to what she says is a authorized opinion by the NCPC on development oversight and mentioned the White Home deliberate to observe it.
“So, it’s not the president who got here up with that authorized opinion himself. That’s a authorized opinion that’s been held by the NCPC for a few years. … Their normal counsel has mentioned, on the subject of section one in every of this venture, the tearing down of the present East Wing construction, a submission is just not required legally for that, just for vertical development will a submission be required, and that’s a authorized opinion from them, and we’re following that authorized opinion.”
What’s vertical development? Loads of folks questioned what she was even speaking about.
“Vertical development? I actually work within the business and I’ve by no means heard development categorized in that method,” a Threads person wrote, becoming a member of the various clearly confused by Leavitt’s reply, or relatively non-answer.
“Just for vertical development”? What does that even imply? Like if he decides to construct one in every of his shitty lodges out again?” requested one other.
One other jumped in with extra particulars, “As an architect who’s practiced for nearly 40 years (principally in DC), I can attest I’ve by no means heard the time period “vertical development” used to explain new development. It’s both demolition or development (or reworking or renovation). “Vertical development” is a made up time period to make what they’re doing appear in some way extra legit. It’s not.”
Leavitt nonetheless didn’t reply the query however as an alternative continued by asking a query herself.
“I might simply add, can any president do such a factor to the White Home grounds? There have been many presidents up to now who’ve made their mark on this stunning White Home complicated. This briefing room, as you all know, was not as soon as a briefing room. It was a swimming pool. There have been presidents who’ve utterly torn down the Govt Mansion,” she said earlier than persevering with with a prediction.
“In due time, the East Wing goes to be extra stunning and trendy than ever earlier than,” she proclaimed. “And as well as, there might be a giant, stunning ballroom that may maintain large events and state visits for generations to return.”
Nonetheless not answering the query, Jiang tried once more pushing extra forecefully the second time. “So, it appears like the reply is, sure, he can tear down no matter he desires.”
Leavitt went on the defensive instantly whereas interrupting. “That’s not what we’re saying. That’s a authorized opinion that’s been held for a few years. No, it’s one thing that presidents have completed for years and years,” she insisted as she held up images exhibiting the development of the West Wing and West Terrace in 1902.
Jiang pushed again once more when Leavitt’s visuals didn’t shut her up. As an alternative, Leavitt ignored her observe up and diverted her consideration to a different reporter who requested why Trump didn’t inform the American people who the ballroom would contain demolishing the East Wing.
One viewer caught the slight. “Karolyin’ received so excited when her espresso boy handed her these footage. She actually was happy with what she thought was a gotcha,” they noticed.
Leavitt lied once more, claiming that when the unique ballroom plans had been unveiled to the press this summer season it was clear the East Wing must go. That may be a full falsehood. On the time Trump characterised the ballroom as an growth of the East Wing, not a teardown.
“I actually want folks like Leavitt would cease the incessant mendacity in an try to persuade us all he isn’t the foul, morally decrepit narcissist he so blatantly is. It’s an insult to each pondering individual,” an X person proclaimed.
One other noticed, “They imagine that no guidelines apply to them.”
Trump first unveiled plans for a brand new 90,000 sq. foot ballroom this summer season, claiming it was an extension of the East Wing and that donors would pay the $200 million price ticket.
Now the East Wing has been demolished and the fee estimate has elevated to $300 million. It’s unclear when will probably be accomplished.
