This text was produced by the nonprofit publication Capital & Primary. It’s printed right here with permission.
Bear in mind Donald Trump, the champion of nationwide infrastructure?
Amid his outsized fixations — making immigrants the bane of the nation and bolstering tax cuts for the wealthy — it’s straightforward to overlook that in his first time period, the person who made his title as a non-public developer repeatedly promised to repair the nation’s “crumbling infrastructure.” He promised to do far higher than the primary GOP “infrastructure president,” Dwight Eisenhower.
RELATED: How Would Life Be Completely different Had Kamala Received?
Between 2017 and 2019, Trump proposed spending as a lot as $2 trillion to improve America’s roads, bridges and airports. He sought bipartisan assist for large tasks that, he insisted, had been “important” to retaining America nice. For a short second, it appeared doable for Trump to shamelessly promote himself as president and do some good for the nation.
Alas, Trump proved to be too distracted by his personal lack of focus, infighting in his administration and controversy round his relationship with Russian chief Vladimir Putin. Throughout repeated “Infrastructure Weeks,” Trump would invariably make loads of non-infrastructure information, overshadowing and undermining no matter constructive efforts his authorities had in thoughts. By the point the COVID pandemic hit over the past yr of Trump’s presidential time period, the White Home basically gave up on any massive buildout, or any buildout in any respect.
Sarcastically, whereas the profession businessman didn’t turn out to be the Infrastructure President in his first go-around, the profession politician — Joe Biden — did. He signed laws that wasn’t simply historic for its $550 billion infrastructure price ticket, but in addition for its bigger imaginative and prescient and ambition.
The Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act of 2021 was supposed to modernize the nation’s power, broadband web, bridges, roads and extra, whereas requiring that almost half of it will be in-built underserved communities the place the necessity was traditionally better. Infrastructure and social fairness would get dramatic upgrades on the similar time.
He’s so far been extra centered on making his legacy about tearing issues down, not constructing them up.
Now, six months into Trump’s second, far more partisan and more and more authoritarian presidency, he has proven little to little interest in both. His second-term obsession with snuffing out variety, fairness, and inclusion has translated, since retaking the White Home, within the immediate cancellation of the fairness provision, often called Justice 40, in Biden’s infrastructure laws.
As for the tasks created by that laws, he paused funding and took down the web site Make investments.gov, which had been offering states with updates on them. These tasks at the moment are endangered by Trump’s different new obsession — erasing all issues Biden and “massive authorities” normally.
His aspirations as a can-do developer for the nation have been changed by his dedication to build up an increasing number of energy; he’s so far been extra centered on making his legacy about tearing issues down, not constructing them up.
And but the twinned mission of fairness and infrastructure is just not useless, although just like the individuals concerned in loads of efforts at social change, the individuals intent on that twinned mission are attempting to determine a approach to proceed in a all of a sudden hostile atmosphere.
Take the Fairness in Infrastructure Challenge Pledge. When the Infrastructure Act handed in 2021, dozens of native governments, transit authorities, water and port authorities and monetary establishments concerned in infrastructure got here collectively to decide to rising variety in federal contracting, which was vastly expanded by the laws.
This was additionally within the wake of the George Floyd motion, when the nation was nonetheless considering particular methods to realize better racial justice on as massive a scale as doable. With its give attention to diversifying federal contractors in infrastructure work that might take years, the pledge was answering that decision. The Fairness in Infrastructure Challenge, described as a “coalition of the dedicated,” is rooted in California however has members in states together with Colorado, Illinois and Kansas.
The twinned mission of fairness and infrastructure is just not useless.
And regardless of Trump’s return to energy, its numbers are rising: In April, the EIP Pledge introduced 17 new signatory businesses within the previous 9 months, bringing membership to a complete of 91. That’s a 33% enhance from 2022.
However that progress has include a softening of once-bold language about aiding the mission of racial justice and historic redress. Lately, EIP is touting fairness as financial widespread sense. In a January assertion, it referred to as itself an “financial growth group” creating alternatives for “traditionally underutilized companies.”
The argument is that bringing small, succesful however much less skilled companies into the historically massive business-dominated federal contracting pool heightens competitors and lowers prices, which saves businesses — together with components of the federal authorities — cash.
What’s to not like? Challenge member Ingrid Merriwether referred to as it a no brainer. Merriwether is African American and president and CEO of Merriwether Williams Insurance coverage Companies, an insurance coverage agency serving Los Angeles and the Bay Space that focuses on serving to small companies, particularly minority and women-owned companies, qualify for public contracts.
Navigating round hostile political realities to pursue variety objectives is nothing new for her, or for California. She launched her insurance coverage agency in 1997, a yr after the passage of Proposition 209, the landmark California state initiative that banned affirmative motion in faculty admissions and public contracting. Regardless of the political headwinds, Merriwether has diversified contracting by facilitating $1 billion in small enterprise bonding — to supply ensures {that a} enterprise will fulfill its contractual obligations — over the past 28 years. Of all of the small companies she’s helped into the massive leagues of federal contracting, solely two failed to finish their tasks — a failure charge of lower than one-tenth of 1%.
She expects the EIP Pledge mission will reproduce that form of success exponentially. Solely 5% of federal contractors are Black and the same proportion are girls. The needle hasn’t moved a lot within the three and a half years because the Infrastructure Act handed, although the door to alternatives was extra open than it had ever been.
Maintaining that door open is important, Merriweather stated, for small companies but in addition for communities the place these enterprise homeowners work, dwell and spend cash.
Producing these “financial multiplicative results” is why Merriwether stated fairness, nevertheless a lot it’s demonized, stays the pledge’s focus.
Sustaining that focus has turn out to be the true, generally surreal struggle in Trump 2.0, particularly for such a high-profile effort involving a lot public cash. Toks Omishakin, California’s secretary of transportation, lately declined an interview concerning the Pledge however stated in an emailed response that since 2022, the state has set file ranges for small enterprise participation by way of mentorship and different applications. He added: “We should transfer from symbolic to systemic efforts — each single individual deserves the possibility to achieve success.”
Merriwether identified that “each single individual” does embody white-owned companies that, regardless of their historic benefits, additionally need assistance competing with big-money companies. In different phrases, the Pledge practices the form of across-the-board variety that even MAGA ought to discover exhausting to oppose. Moreover rising earnings, Merriwether added that one other large good thing about bringing smaller companies into massive tasks is that it creates a way of shared threat and funding in a profitable consequence for all.
“It actually modifications the dynamic of the entire mission,” she noticed. At this second, that’s a strong thought.
However evidently not for Trump. Final month, his Division of Transportation introduced a new infrastructure initiative, a $488 million grant program centered totally on bettering roads and bridges in rural areas. It’s a modest redux of Trump’s first-term plan, far much less formidable than Biden’s, most notable for stripping out all of the fairness provisions Biden noticed as important. This time round, it’s referred to as Higher Using Investments to Leverage Growth — BUILD for brief. What really will get constructed within the period of MAGA stays to be seen.
That is from Erin Aubry Kaplan’s column, The Arc, which examines the persistent obstacles to racial justice and alternatives for progress in an period of receding Black presence in Los Angeles and California.
Copyright 2025 Capital & Primary
