by Sharelle B. McNair
July 2, 2025
There was nothing enjoyable in regards to the Tulsa Race Bloodbath, labeled as one of many single worst incidents of racial violence in American historical past.
A lawsuit accuses meals producer Normal Mills of retaliating towards a former worker after reporting alleged “enjoyable details” throughout Black Historical past Month, referencing delicate historic occasions together with the Tulsa Bloodbath and Black Codes, Fox 9 Information reported.
The discrimination and retaliation lawsuit was filed by Storms Dworak LLC on behalf of L. Lee Tyus Jr., a Black man, who alleges the corporate violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act when he was terminated for talking up. The Minnesota-based firm allegedly handed out flyers through the February 2025 celebration, labeling violent acts of historical past just like the Tulsa Race Bloodbath as “Enjoyable Information.”
After expressing concern, he was positioned on involuntary depart. Upon his return, Tyus shared contact info of different staff who claimed to be offended by the content material. After copies of the doc he created had been positioned within the breakroom, the litigation alleges he was escorted out and fired.
The $50,000 lawsuit pushes for a civil advantageous and legal professional charges, as, in accordance with KARE 11, Tyus began working at Normal Mills in 2019. In January 2025, he acquired a efficiency assessment stating he was “on observe.”
There was nothing enjoyable in regards to the Tulsa Race Bloodbath, also called the Black Wall Road Bloodbath. Labeled as one of many single worst incidents of racial violence in American historical past, the occasion lasted for 18 hours on Could 31 and June 1, 1921, leading to an estimated 300 Black People being killed. As well as, a white mob destroyed over 1,000 houses and companies, burning Oklahoma’s second-largest African-American group to the bottom.
As soon as the violence ended, town was positioned below martial regulation.
Surviving Tulsa residents have been preventing for justice and restitution for many years. In 2024, the Oklahoma Supreme Courtroom denied a request to rethink a ruling that when dismissed a lawsuit filed by the final two identified dwelling survivors. The go well with was an effort to drive town of Tulsa and others to make restitution for the destruction below the state’s public nuisance regulation. Authorized reps additionally argued that town appropriated Black Wall Road’s iconic status for its “monetary and reputational profit.”
In a press release, Tyus’s lawyer, Naomi Martin, mentioned the lawsuit was filed as a result of folks shouldn’t be focused for standing up for what they imagine. “Normal Mills has a nationwide model and a deep Minnesota footprint. In my opinion, that form of presence comes with accountability, and an organization of this dimension ought to be modeling what it means to assist staff who converse up, not firing them. Mr. Tyus did what each worker ought to really feel protected to do — he stood up, spoke out towards what he believed was discrimination, and reported it. That took braveness,” Martin mentioned.
“And it’s precisely the form of motion the Minnesota Human Rights Act exists to guard. We introduced this case as a result of nobody ought to face retaliation for doing the correct factor.”
Whereas Normal Mills didn’t touch upon the problem, the corporate did reveal that they “don’t tolerate discrimination or retaliation.”
RELATED CONTENT: Black Staff Declare Racists Ran Normal Mills Plant In Lawsuit
