The mom of a 7-year-old particular wants scholar has filed a federal lawsuit claiming {that a} Memphis elementary college useful resource officer used extreme pressure when he threw her son right into a bookcase, slammed him to the bottom and handcuffed him after he acted out in school.
Cetera Jones, who’s Black, filed the lawsuit, obtained by Atlanta Black Star, on behalf of herself and her son, recognized as L.J., in a Tennessee U.S. District Court docket on Nov. 21. It claims that L.J., whose behavioral outburst on Nov. 24, 2024, was associated to his incapacity, suffered a black eye and was emotionally traumatized through the incident.

The boy’s instructor and an unnamed college useful resource officer (SRO) at Levi Elementary College in Memphis used unreasonable pressure and failed to make use of disaster interventions and de-escalation techniques applicable for a disabled second grader with particular wants, the grievance contends.
‘This Is Completely Unacceptable’: Black Entrepreneur Says Ameris Financial institution Flagged and Froze Her Accounts After Teller Questioned Her Enterprise
In addition to the tough bodily remedy that violated his federal civil rights, the college violated state regulation and the Tennessee Board of Training guidelines and rules by “wrenching his arms behind his again” and handcuffing the 7-year-old with metallic handcuffs, a mechanical restraint not applicable for his age, measurement, and disabilities, or the circumstances, wherein the boy posed no imminent danger of hurt to others, his attorneys argue.
L.J. was put into the again of a “police-like” college SRO automobile alongside along with his particular training instructor, Rhonda Mitchell, and the college principal, Nekia Patton, and pushed dwelling, the place Jones heard him “screaming in misery,” then noticed that he was handcuffed and had a black eye that he didn’t have that morning, the lawsuit says. Jones referred to as 911 and Memphis police responded.
The lawsuit alleges that the college useful resource officer and different college workers dedicated assault and battery and falsely imprisoned L.J., inflicting pointless ache, bodily harm and emotional hurt.
It additionally asserts that Memphis-Shelby County Colleges maintained insurance policies and practices that had been intentionally detached in coaching and supervision relating to SRO interactions with elementary-age college students with disabilities, in violation of the People With Disabilities Act, his constitutional rights towards unreasonable seizure and extreme pressure, and state regulation.
Jones and her son search a jury trial to find out compensatory and punitive damages for his bodily accidents, emotional misery, lack of academic entry, medical bills, and different damages.
In addition they search an injunction from the courtroom requiring Memphis-Shelby County Colleges and the Shelby County Sheriff’s Workplace from utilizing mechanical constraints on college students receiving particular training companies and limiting any bodily holding restraint to true emergencies involving imminent danger of great bodily hurt, and “by no means to compel compliance or as punishment.”
The plaintiffs additionally need the courtroom to order college useful resource officers and college workers to coach on insurance policies for optimistic behavioral helps, de-escalation, incapacity lodging and trauma-informed practices, and to watch and report on their SRO makes use of of pressure on college students with disabilities.
A spokesperson for Memphis-Shelby County Colleges stated in an emailed assertion to Atlanta Black Star, “We are conscious of the grievance however can not remark additional at the moment.”
In the meantime, the Shelby County Sheriff’s Workplace issued an announcement that it has been wrongfully named within the lawsuit, as “the Sheriff’s Workplace had no SROs assigned to the college on the time of the alleged incident, nor does it at the moment have any SROs assigned there. The lawsuit improperly names Sheriff [Floyd] Bonner. The lawyer representing the plaintiffs apparently did not conduct ample analysis and has wrongfully implicated the Sheriff. Subsequently, the Sheriff is demanding dismissal from the lawsuit and an apology from the lawyer concerned.”
On Nov. 25 the plaintiffs filed a movement for expedited discovery, arguing that they’re at the moment unable to establish sure defendants, together with the identification of the college useful resource officer, and whether or not he was employed by Memphis-Shelby County Colleges (MSCS) or the Shelby County Sheriff’s Workplace.
In addition they search to be taught from MSCS, the college administrator who sought and directed the SRO, and for the courtroom to order that any movies, recordings, emails, textual content messages, incident stories, paperwork, or electronically saved data associated to the incident be preserved.
The varsity system has 30 days after being served, or till Dec. 24, to reply to the invention request, and till Dec. 12 to file a response to the grievance.





















