US President Donald Trump has publicly accused Beyoncé Knowles-Carter, Oprah Winfrey, and Reverend Al Sharpton of receiving unlawful funds in change for endorsing former Vice-President Kamala Harris’s presidential marketing campaign.
On Sunday, Trump alleged on his Fact Social platform that the Harris marketing campaign paid Beyoncé $11 million (R200.2 million), Oprah $3 million (R54.6 million) and Sharpton $600,000 (R10.92 million).
Nonetheless, no verified documentation at present helps these claims.
The US Federal Election Fee (FEC) filings immediately contradict the figures Trump cited, displaying considerably decrease and legally justifiable quantities for campaign-related providers.
Marketing campaign Data Reveal Authorized and Clear Transactions
In response to FEC data, Beyoncé’s firm, Parkwood Leisure, acquired $165,000 for a fundraising live performance.
The cost lined occasion manufacturing and never a private endorsement.
Oprah’s Harpo Productions produced a nationally televised city corridor that includes Harris and acquired $1 million for the occasion.
Marketing campaign filings and New York Put up reporting confirmed this determine. In the meantime, the Harris marketing campaign donated $500 000 to the Nationwide Motion Community, based by Sharpton.
The Harris marketing campaign publicly disclosed the donation however didn’t specify its precise function in official filings. No proof hyperlinks the cost to any endorsement. FactCheck.org and PolitiFact state that such funds are authorized in the event that they replicate truthful market worth and are correctly reported.
Authorized consultants additionally verify that no verified proof helps Trump’s declare that these celebrities have been paid to endorse Harris.
Movie star Responses and Public Denials Mount
Tina Knowles publicly said that Beyoncé didn’t obtain cost to help Harris. She said on Instagram that her daughter lined all private prices.
Oprah additionally responded to the allegations. She confirmed she acquired no private cost from the marketing campaign. As an alternative, Harpo Productions dealt with occasion staffing and manufacturing below a proper contract.
In the meantime, Sharpton’s group addressed the controversy. They denied that he took cost for endorsement.
Additionally they defined that marketing campaign funds supported group outreach and occasion logistics. Authorized consultants additionally confirmed the transactions have been lawful. The funds have been disclosed and mirrored truthful market worth.
Authorized Consultants Reject Trump’s Prosecution Calls for
Authorized analysts have raised doubts about Trump’s latest requires legal prices in opposition to Democrats and celebrities who supported Harris.
US marketing campaign finance legislation permits funds to people or entities if campaigns correctly disclose them, guarantee they replicate truthful market worth for authentic providers, and keep away from utilizing them for private profit unrelated to marketing campaign exercise.
Nonetheless, legality should still rely upon the cost’s intent and context, as decided by the Federal Election Fee or the Division of Justice.
In response to FEC filings and public data, the Harris marketing campaign paid Beyoncé’s Parkwood Leisure and Oprah’s Harpo Productions for occasion manufacturing, not endorsements.
Nonetheless, no verified authorized knowledgeable has confirmed that Trump’s accusations meet the edge for legal prosecution.
DO CELEBRITY CAMPAIGN ROLES NEED STRICTER FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT?
Tell us by leaving a remark beneath, or ship a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11.
Subscribe to The South African web site’s newsletters and observe us on WhatsApp, Fb, X and Bluesky for the newest information.
