by Sharelle B. McNair
February 4, 2026
Primarily, the invoice doesn’t give any authorities management to host distant “kill switches” or allow automakers from giving authorities entry to anybody’s automotive.
This is the reason everybody must be cautious in what they consider on social media, as Republican leaders unfold false rumors that the U.S. Congress handed a “kill swap” laws that might “remotely” shut automobiles down, Snopes reviews.
Rumors unfold on-line in January 2026 that Congress had handed a invoice often known as the ‘‘Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act’’ that might enable the federal government to close off vehicles each time it happy. The rumor seemingly began with Texas’s third District Rep. Keith Self, who, on Jan. 22, referred to a vote as “unbelievably disturbing” with claims that “57 Home Republicans simply joined nearly all of the Democrats to make sure the federal government can shut off your automotive each time it desires.”
Then, Florida’s Gov. Ron DeSantis jumped in with a repost. “The concept that the federal authorities would require auto producers to equip vehicles with a ‘kill swap’ that may be managed by the federal government is one thing you’d anticipate in Orwell’s 1984, and but…,” the failed presidential candidate wrote.
Nevertheless, that isn’t the case.
What Self and DeSantis had been referring to was a failed 2026 plan to cease a signed 2021 bipartisan invoice below the Biden-Harris Administration that might require the automotive trade to put in expertise to establish the consequences of drunken driving and “stop or restrict motorized vehicle operation” upon detection.
Primarily, the invoice doesn’t grant the federal government management to host distant “kill switches” or allow automakers to provide the federal government entry to anybody’s automotive. However below Part 24220, the Nationwide Freeway Visitors Security Administration is predicted to mandate “superior impaired-driving prevention expertise” in all new passenger automobiles.
Whereas some may even see the laws as a method to preserve drunk drivers off the highway, lawmakers have raised constitutional alarms. In line with CBT Information, there received’t be a requirement for breathalyzers or legislation enforcement involvement. Simply judgment made by the expertise. There may be additionally the difficulty of drivers overcoming the lockout, as there aren’t any parameters for a way drivers will get out of what critics name “kill swap jail.”
The critique was began by fellow Republican lawmaker Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who posted criticism on X. “When your automotive shuts down as a result of it doesn’t approve of your driving, how will you attraction your roadside conviction?” he wrote Jan. 21.
In the end, 57 Republican and 211 Democratic members of Congress voted in opposition to Massie’s requires an modification to dam the drunken-driving detection expertise mandate and any federal spending on Part 24220 enforcement.
RELATED CONTENT: One thing for Everybody on the L.A. Auto Present
